01 December, 2010

"I'm Sorry Sir, This Card Has Been Cancelled"

It's a great part in the film, isn't it?

That bit where the protagonist tries to use their credit card and finds it does not work. This is usually because they are either broke, or the government/other powerful body is trying to bring them down.

I wonder if they have agencies specifically for that line. The "I'm Sorry Sir, This Card Has Been Cancelled" Agency, which has a variety of talented actors who specialise in different deliveries:

Passive aggressive/assertive: "I'm sorry sir, this card has been cancelled."

Sympathetic: "I'm very sorry...but this card has been cancelled."

Deadpan: "Sorry, this card has been cancelled."

But when it happens in real life it's kind of embarrassing for both the shop assistant and you.


30 November, 2010

Hayfever Sweeping the State Due to "Christmas Allergy"


The sharp increase in hayfever and asthma attacks across Victoria can be explained by unseasonably premature Christmas celebrations, according to an expert in Social Phenomena from the University of Melbourne.

Dr Wendy Sharpike, who completed her doctorate paper Yuletide Allergies: When Christmas Tries to Kill You in 2009, has identified the proliferation of general festiveness as the primary cause.

"This year, we have seen unusually early reminders that Christmas is coming. Appallingly unmusical arrangements of Christmas carols blasting through department stores, glittering reindeers and Christmas trees adorning ever corner...these are the kinds of things that can trigger severe allergy attacks."

The spike in hospital admissions with serious asthma is a something that needs to be linked with its true cause, Sharpike said.
Above: Sharpike describes in detail the "hellishly deadly tripwire of allergy triggers that is Myer in November."


"Too often these allergy trends are brushed under the dusty carpet with explanations about pollen counts and other ridiculous theories.

"We have to stop accepting such unscientific explanations, and begin to consider what is actually causing these problems," she added, steadily appearing more unhinged.

While her comments have been almost unanimously slammed by health experts and immunologists across the state, Sharpike is adamant that the allergies will only be stopped when Christmas is toned down.

"It doesn't require for us to completely trash Christmas. But certainly, the government - whoever that is - needs to step up to the plate and put in place some comprehensive guidelines for the two factors which my study has shown to be directly linked to allergic reactions: tastefulness and timeliness."

15 November, 2010

Qantas Plane Turbines "Spewing Confetti"

A Qantas plane en route to London was forced to turn around and return to Sydney airport when confetti began to explode from two of the wing turbines.

The colourful shower of small, coloured pieces of paper began as the plane passed over Brisbane, approximately 730 kilometres from its starting point.

Staff said that passengers were "equally delighted and terrified" by the multicoloured swirl issuing from the wing turbines, which was visible from window-side passenger seats.

The shenanigans didn't stop there, as, upon finally landing the plane, more than 2 hours after the confetti explosion began, staff opened the overhead luggage compartments to discover a troop of performing monkeys and tiny piglets.

The monkeys then climbed on top of the piglets and rode them around the inside of the cabin, whilst juggling red and yellow balls.

Passenger reactions ranged from admiration and adoration of the impossibly small riders, to disgust that monkeys and piglets had been rifling through passenger luggage.

"I found it terribly amusing," Victorian secondary school teacher Glenda Murray said.

"There's only one thing cuter than baby monkeys and baby piglets. And that's baby monkeys riding baby piglets. While juggling."

It is unknown exactly where the performing troupe came from, or how they got onto the plane at Sydney airport.

"At this point in time, we're running through a backlog of our security checks, and we're just trying to ascertain exactly how this breach has occurred," one Qantas security official said.

Qantas firmly denied suggestions that this latest plane fault is proof that the airline has become a circus.

"We are currently investigating the exact reason for the confetti and performing animals. We are confident that it is not a problem affecting other planes in this fleet," a spokeswoman said.

UPDATE: 6.45

It has been revealed that the baby monkeys and pigs were escaped from a Japanese zoo, where baby monkeys and baby piglets have been specially bred from a performing pair.


I'm A Real Journalist?


One of the projects I've set myself these holidays is to work on getting some journalism written and published.

Journalism is a funny field in this way, really, because unlike doctors, or teachers, or engineers, you don't need a degree. If you want to do journalism, you need to go out and do it.

So when I found out about a Greens forum in the city yesterday, I thought it would be a good idea to go along and cover it and try and get something published.

So I turned up, pen, paper, and clipboard in hand, and tried to be a journalist.

Feeling a little bit ridiculous, I had a chat with a man who was waiting outside as well beforehand. He described himself as a "not uncritical" Greens supporter, who was more interested in affordable housing than climate change. He also spoke of an interest in democracy, and his view that the Greens have a more transparent approach to this than other parties.

I spoke to newly elected Senator Christine Milne before the forum about her experiences with the balance of power and influence on policy. She talked about the conversion of the luxury car tax to a vehicle efficiency tax, which she said would work as a motivation to move towards more efficient cars, rather than function as a more arbitrary revenue raiser on luxurious cars.

I was considering asking her for an update on her potatoes , but then the talk started and we went inside.

During the talk, Adam Bandt talked about how he'd found the balance of power, and the Climate Change Committee.

But it was Christine Milne, the Greens climate change spokeswoman (and Deputy Greens leader), who had the most to say about this.

In discussing the Climate Change Committee, she raised several interesting ideas:

- Having experts a part of the committee, rather than using them in a solely advisory role, prevents politicians from getting away with playing political games and deliberately attempting to derail or mislead. While experts are certainly not infallible, this did make sense to me.
- A committee will enable politicians to change their opinions and be supported by the consensus of a committee - defending them from words such as 'backflip' and 'dodgy'.

And one of the most interesting aspects of her speech (I must admit I was a tad seduced by her clearly framed, forthright arguments), was her discussion of climate change communication in general. I found this particularly interesting as it is something I've been learning about at university this year.

She outlined, like most climate change communicators, the danger of assuming human beings are rational actors. What academics term the 'information deficit model', this approach assumes that once the facts of climate change are filled in, people ought to appreciate and understand that something must be done.

The danger of this approach is to create fear without agency. People may agree that climate change it a problem, but may not know what to do with this newfound sense of urgency, anxiety, and concern. Hence, if they cannot act or change their behaviours in a way which complements their attitude, it is their attitude which must change. And it is usually a change to confusion and disillusionment, and the relegation of climate change to an issue of lesser immediate importance.

Instead, the dominant climate change communication discourse (which Christine Milne discussed) involves the 'ecological modernisation' argument, where climate change is presented not as a problem which must be solved through a series of actions which lead to negative economic growth, but instead as an opportunity for change, and the creation of a new economic paradigm where economic growth and climate change action are not incompatible.

As I left, I was filled with a range of thoughts and feelings.

I was unsure that I could turn what I'd seen and noted into a concise article that would be suitable for publishing somewhere. There were so many different threads and ideas. How could the article be balanced, if I was essentially reporting what the Greens leaders said to a small gathering of supporters? Yet it would seem inappropriate to me to counter what was said with another point of view from an irrelevant setting.

In the end, this is the article I came up with and have sent this morning off to an online newspaper for potential publication:


Perhaps owing to the rainy Melbourne weather, Sunday afternoon timing, or the end of year exam period for university students, it was a modest audience who greeted Deputy Greens Leader Christine Milne, MP Adam Bandt, and inner-city Greens candidates at yesterday’s forum on the balance of power and climate change, held at the State Library.

With the Victorian state election less than two weeks away, and the election of up to four inner city Greens candidates seemingly within reach, Senator Milne focused on how the balance of power the Greens won in the Federal election had been successfully harnessed as a “pathway to government”, citing the inclusion of Indigenous people and local councils in the constitution as an important gain.

She also looked to the opportunity that gaining lower house seats on November 27 would offer with “the linking of policies from local, to state, to federal.”

Particular emphasis was given to climate change and the Climate Change Committee negotiated by the Greens, which Mr Bandt described as “a reset button.”

Senator Milne discussed the inclusion of experts in the committee rather than involving them in a solely advisory role. “It is really hard to run political games when there are experts in the room,” she said. She also spoke on the psychology of the committee, which she said would give politicians room to change opinions and be supported by the consensus of a committee.

The meeting concluded with a sense of optimism for the coming election, as Brunswick candidate Ms Cyndi Dawes was hopeful about the result, “whether we win one seat, or three seats, or four.”

This is an outcome which became less likely last night, when the Liberal party announced its intention to preference the ALP ahead of the Greens in all lower house seats.

While The Age, the Herald Sun, and The Australian have all unanimously asserted that the Liberal’s decision will almost certainly enable the ALP to retain these seats, ABC election analyst Anthony Green had a different take on the implications, writing “the Greens can still win Melbourne and Richmond.”

I'm not sure that it's going to be published.

I don't feel that it's excellently written. It is jumbled, and perhaps tries to tackle too much in so few words (right up against the word limit for publication in this particular online newspaper).

But at the same time it has made me feel good, because it is a beginning.








12 November, 2010

Who Is Getting Up?


I've recently signed up to a number of email newsletters from across the political spectrum, so I can have a look at the sorts of communication different groups put out.

One of these groups is 'GetUp!', which is, according to its website, "an independent, grass-roots community advocacy organisation giving everyday Australians opportunities to get involved and hold politicians accountable on important issues."

There are strong elements of populist rhetoric on their website and across their communications. While 'populist rhetoric' might sound an alarming or derogatory label, it simply refers to a discourse which centres upon the actor or central figure of 'the people' - a homogenous, virtuous group sharing common views and opinions.

'The people' are usually at danger of having their voice suppressed by others. In the discourse adopted by GetUp, the people must have their voice heard so that the democratic process can occur unimpeded.

Their very name, 'GetUp!' is a call to 'progressive' Australians to stand up and take action on a range of issues. GetUp collected data informs us that their supporters are people concerned about climate change, asylum seeker and refugee rights, water, renewable energy, and healthcare.

This data helps make clear exactly what the term 'progressive Australians' means when used to describe 'the people' GetUp represents.

GetUp asserts that the organisation is "not for profit and receives no money from any political party or the government. We rely solely on funds and in-kind donations from the Australian public."

In this sense, GetUp posits itself as a conduit for progressive Australians, which, through advertisements, online campaigns, and petitions, can help citizens engage with their politicians. It helps them have their voice heard.


Another populist group active in Australian politics (which I stumbled upon during a uni assessment) is the Australian Tea Party.

Unlike GetUp, which claims to represent progressive Australians, The Australian TEA Party writes that "We unite behind three main concepts: Free Markets, Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Small Governments."

A smaller afterthought notes that "Individual freedom is of course assisted by following these 3 concepts."

However, while 'progressive' is different to 'small government' in focus, the populist elements remain the same. The Australian TEA Party is "a grassroots citizen empowerment movement". It knows that you feel as though you have "lost your voice", and that "real choices that would actually work - making life better - are never presented" in contemporary politics.

Interestingly, on both of the websites for these groups is the symbol of stars, reminiscent of the Australian flag. Both of these groups suggest that they represent Australians.

They are both speaking on our behalf, both claiming to be organisations belonging to us, yet they have very different ideas about what we want.

So, which of them is right?

There is a dichotomous distinction which is usually made when labelling or discussing populist groups. They may be deemed true grassroots movements, set up by a number of concerned citizens to deal with issues which are important to them.

Or it may be what is called 'astroturfing', or falsely claiming to originate from the ordinary public, when in fact the group is carefully managed by one or several businesses (or politicians, other bodies with ample funding behind them), and has the aim of dealing with issues important to these businesses through the voice of 'the people'.

E.g., it is much more convincing to have a grassroots movement of citizens advocating that we should stop being mean to banks, than to have banks tell us to stop being mean to them.

GetUp certainly has a stronger claim to be able to speak for their more targeted demographic of progressive Australians. Petitions are supported by these people, and campaign videos virally distributed by them. In this way, GetUp is closely involved with its 'people'.

The Australian TEA Party's legitimacy as a representation of people's views is not as transparently displayed on their website, with a general sense of all-encompassing inclusivity attempting to sweep the reader up. It might be reasonably speculated that this is an astroturf group, supported and perhaps managed by businesses and banks who would very much like to be less regulated and monitored by government. But we cannot be sure.

This is why populist rhetoric is something like ventriloquism. People speaking on 'our' behalf put across 'our' point of view. Imitating 'our' voice. The danger being, of course, that the many groups 'speaking on our behalf' might prevent us from actually being heard.

The similarities and differences in both of these groups shows that pointing the finger at an argument and labelling it 'just populism' fails to appreciate the complexities of populist rhetoric. Like clothing, it may be used to dress up arguments and give them authority or the backing of the Australian people/battlers/progressive Australians/fair dinkum Aussies.

But it is not an evil in itself.

It is the ends to which it its immense motivational power is harnessed which must be examined. And most importantly, who is channelling the voice of the people?

Tickets for Thinking Pug's hilarious 'Puppetry of the People' cost $550 for adults, $549 for concession, and go on sale next March.

03 November, 2010

"Edgy"

Last night I trusted my Mum to cut my hair.

It was the first time I've done this, and I did it because it saves money, would be a valuable bonding experience with my Mum, and would avoid these conversations:

Hairdresser: You're still at uni, right?

Me: Yeah, we're on holidays now actually, so that's good.

Hairdresser: Got any big plans for the weekend?

Me: Oh, you know, just general tidying up, catching up with some friends.

Hairdresser: Yeah, that's nice. That's good, to have a quiet weekend.

Me: Yes it is.

Hairdresser: Mmhm.

*silent snipping*

Hairdresser: Can you hold your head straight for me again?

*adjusts head*

*more silent snipping*

*snip, snip*

Hairdresser (to lady next to me having her hair dyed): How are we, Mary?

Mary: Oh, not bad, love, not bad.

Hairdresser: Getting up to much this weekend?

Mary: Going to a wedding, actually.

Hairdresser: A wedding! Oh, that's nice.

Mary: Yes, yes. It's my niece.

Hairdresser: I went to wedding the other week. And it was a funny wedding, I can tell you that! They wanted to have a cruise ship wedding, so they packed us all onto a cruise ship and it was stuffy and hot - that was at 6 o'clock, but then they didn't serve dinner till 9 o'clock!

*snip, snip*

Mary: Oh.

Hairdresser: Yeah, it wasn't a very classy wedding, you know.


But here were the things that went on while getting my hair cut by Mum:

- lots of "hmmm"
- lots of "what do we do here?" not in the sense of an expert giving my some choice, but in the sense of someone genuinely pondering what on earth they are meant to do
- lots of "SNIP" followed by near hysterical laughter and "It's good, it's good"

The final "edgy" (Mum, 2010) haircut had be terrified before looking in the mirror, fearing it would be something like this:



But in fact it is quite a respectable haircut. And a bit edgy.



30 October, 2010

Daytime TV

Daytime television nearly always leaves me feeling depressed, confused, and upset at the hours I have lost watching it.

And so the last time I was watching, I decided that it was time to get to the bottom of why.

The reason became patently clear once I started actually looking for it. It isn’t the programming, even though the mildly amusing 80s American ‘thrillers’ enjoy a more privileged midday movie position than they should.

The reason is what goes in between the programs.

It’s the ads.

Ads in different timeslots address us differently. During Masterchef, we might be bombarded with ads encouraging us to incorporate Western Star butter into our culinary adventures, or to use Handee Ultra when we (or our exceptionally gifted children) make a mess in the process of crafting the perfect chocolate fondant.

But daytime television ads are different. These are just some of the things they tell us:

- You are flabby, and need to purchase an Ab-Pro or similar to tone your body

- You are fat, and need to join Weight Watchers to lose the weight and keep it off

- You are too hairy, and need to go to a painless laser place to remove unwanted hair

- You are going bald, and need to visit Ashley and Martin (I’m never sure whether this name is the two surnames of the business partners, or the first names of a homely couple who run a pretty slick hair regrowth clinic)

- You have bad teeth – they are either too sensitive, and you need Sensodyne (advertisement complete with erratic camera cuts), or they are yellow and unattractive, in which case you need a UV whitening light (a solarium for your mouth? Sure, sounds harmless enough)

- You need Foxtel, because the fifteen or so free to air channels are not enough to satisfy your endless search for mind-numbing content. Also, your life will revolve around recording, re-watching, replaying and basically living off, your new Foxtel channels

- You are involved in a lengthy and very costly legal struggle, and require some ‘no win, no cost’ lawyers to help you out with an obligation free phone call

- Your skin is too pale; you need to tan up either with a spray, lotion, or good ole’ solarium

- You have severe acne which is inhibiting your life – you must use the same thing that Delta Goodrem used

- You are in severe debt, and it is time to call a helpline

When I’m pummelled with these ads during the day, I begin to feel sick. I feel that my life is wasting away in front of the television. How will I foot the bills for the arduous legal battle I’m embroiled in anyway?

By addressing us with these messages, the advertisements attempt to shepherd people into the respective roles, and it is this that depresses me.

The final message is, perhaps, all things considered, the kindest one.

Having constructed daytime TV watchers as balding, pasty, chubby, legally hopeless, hairy, gat toothed, debt-ridden, afflicted individuals, the advertisements at least have the mercy to remind us that we will probably die soon.

Grandparents, ruffling a small child’s hair before staring down the camera and smiling serenely as they say,

“We love to keep active and enjoy life. But we know we won’t be around for much longer.”

Then some crisp, suited up woman usually spring in and starts spruiking a funeral plan or life insurance scheme that will mean no family has to bear the financial burden of all the funeral costs. It is always entertaining to watch them attempt to make the proposition of “if you give me your money now, I will help pay for your funeral later” sound tasteful.

And that is why I don’t like daytime TV.





18 October, 2010

Angry Lady Waits in Queue

An angry woman today waited in a queue, and was dismayed to find that none of the others waiting in the line wanted to share in her outpouring of caustic anger.

The lady was one of several people waiting in a queue at a petrol station when a malfunctioning credit card system caused a delay in service.

The lady, who was waiting to purchase a 600 ml Diet Coke, initially expressed her frustration at the delay by stamping her foot and exhaling loudly. However, when the boy waiting in front of her unwittingly made eye contact, she took the opportunity to articulate her stormy anguish.

"Seriously, he is a f--king dickhead," she opined of the man behind the service counter, adding, after the boy gave absolutely no signs for her to continue her emotional outburst, "seriously, he must be f--king retarded or something."

The boy, who was calmly smiling and nonplussed as he waited to buy six bags of ice, did not join in her speculations as to the competence of the easily within-earshot serviceman, instead avoiding her wrathful gaze lest he incite her to greater acts beyond verbal aggression.

Mother of two Sandra, who was present at the incident, voiced her frustration at the lady. "It's always sad when there are angry people who can't step back and get some perspective on these things."

The lady's unsolicited monologue came to a pithy conclusion after the wait was prolonged for another unbearable minute.

"It's official. He's a f--king retard."

03 October, 2010

AFL and War: Let's Make a Comparison


One of the footballers said, after the draw last Saturday, "It was war today, and it's not too often you come back and fight a war a week later, but we're up for it."

Mmm, grassy.

Afghanistan

This is no new analogy. AFL is frequently referred to in terms of battles, heroes, casualties, carnage, etc.

The media loves to hype up just how much all Melbournians love the football. And by writing and exposing us to pieces on how football is our religion, or how the only thing that people will judge you by is your AFL team loyalties, these trends (if they ever existed) are strongly reinforced.

My tutor from last Semester suggested that sports are some sort of 'war substitute', which satiate some sort of inherent human desire for conflict, presumably analogous to the 'hate speech' in 1984.

But this becomes confusing if we consider that we have no need for a substitute - Australia is involved in wars already. Why don't people follow the conflict in Afghanistan with the same zeal and passion that they follow the battles, triumphs, and losses of their chosen football teams?

I guess it's because

a) Nobody knows who the sides are
b) Nobody knows anything

I feel so unable to comprehend any of it - sure, I might know that Hamid Karzai is the current Prime Minister, and that the Taliban are still preventing stable governance. But how can I possibly hope to really know anything? All I know are words and figures. They mean little. I read this fascinating interview with Australian journalist Michael Ware, who has spent many years in Iraq, as well as Afghanistan.

He describes the lives of people in Australia (and, I suppose, all people living in affluent nations) as "a bubble floating on the sea of humanity", and notes that once he left it, he is unable to step back inside it in the same way.

I sometimes wonder whether I want to be able to step out of the bubble, and die having known what people are, what they do, why they do it.

And I think that this is why it is so ridiculous to compare football with war. Most people making the comparison have never been on a battlefield. Everything I read about war and violent conflict seems to agree upon the random way in which life and death are handed out.

Nobody goes into a football field expecting they might die. Football is so securely entrenched within the bubble - in a bubble of advertising for sponsors, of team colours, umpires who can stop the 'battle' with a blow of a whistle, and an audience who can actually see and know exactly what goes on on the battlefield.


...and perhaps we would care about them when they did happen.

27 September, 2010

Blessed Fat Chips

Some soft news writing from journalism today:

I approach the shop slowly, drinking in the brightly lit display of curry puffs, hash browns and spring rolls. The smell of sizzling oil wafts delicately from the back kitchen. Engorged pizzas drip with cheese. And chips. Glistening, golden brown, oil-saturated chips

I approach the counter, and am greeted by a cheery girl, wearing a yellow t-shirt, boldly emblazoned in red with the name of the shop, Fat Chips. She smiles from behind her rectangular glasses.

The question tumbles from my mouth like a potato cake into the fryer. Why Fat Chips?

“People like chips. Students like chips!” she explains passionately, adding that everyone is “all laughing together” when they encounter the refreshingly irreverent name.

A community is formed around Fat Chips, she says, as RMIT teachers and students (attracted, she reflects, by their cut-throat prices) frequently buy their food there, and come to “know us”.

As we speak I look down, and notice that we are standing at the other side of the store. On display at the bench are sandwiches, vegetarian focaccias, carrot, chicken and beetroot wraps. I buy a fruit salad, a goodwill gesture.

These offerings seem incongruous with the gleaming, salty foods presented at the other end of the store. Yet I am beginning to feel that there is much about Fat Chips I do not understand.

I begin to ask another question, but a sudden flurry of customers down at the chips end of the store distracts her, and I realise I will not even have another chance to ask another question, or even her name – my brief glimpse into this noble institution is over.

As I bite into the apple in my fruit salad, it tastes floury and insipid.

Perhaps the apple is not enough. Perhaps I crave something more. Perhaps I crave... fat chips.

19 September, 2010

Just Say Hi!

The greeting of a stranger is a lovely thing.

It's one human saying to another 'we are united by the fact that we're both humans, both outside/inside/trapped in this deadly labyrinth, and in this spirit I wish you well'.

But it doesn't always happen seamlessly. I have decided that there are really three groups into which stranger greetings fit:

1. The Warm Greeting - this is the friendly, genuine, greeting. It can occur in any of the following places, though this listing is by no means exhaustive: parks, residential streets, otherwise nearly empty corridors in buildings, stairs, lifts, doorways (though these are usually much briefer). The greeter will usually bestow a smile, eye contact, and a "hey". They will usually maintain eye contact, allowing for the recipient of the Warm Greeting to respond. Both parties then disengage amiably, and continue on their ways, each feeling a little lighter.

2. The 'Let's Do This' Greeting - almost always, a male greeter delivers this particular form of stranger greeting. It begins as soon as the two have identified each other. Their paths will intersect. The greeter and greetee mentally steel themselves, preparing their lines. But not too early! NEVER too early, because then a conversation has been opened, and it may be several seconds before they pass one another. Instead, at the last moment, a 'Morning' is thrown out, reciprocated, and a shared sigh of relief is exhaled as they pass one another, their civil duty done.

3. The 'AVOID GREETING AT ANY COST' - this occurs when one party has an aversion to any kind of stranger greeting, and so will completely avoid eye contact, staring straight ahead, or at a watch, or mobile, or impromptu newspaper fashioned from some leafy detritus on the footpath. This works well if neither parties wish to engage in a greeting, but can cause hurt and embarrassment if one party does not recognise the intentions of the other, and either attempts eye contact, or volunteers a nod and 'Hello' automatically. The other person will usually pretend not to have noticed, and continue walking.


I am so tired that I can't even fully comprehend how boring a topic this was. But I have thought this when I go for a walk in my local park. I wanted to draw some pictures for it, but I have decided that they don't always enhance a post, especially when they are appalling.

Sorry.

16 September, 2010

Enough Is Enough

Tired Gelati Gecko,

This Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde farce has carried on far enough.

I'm going to be damned blunt here - pull your socks up. Your wallowing and splashing about is unwarranted, and lowers the overall tone of an already troubled publication.

You could take the time to write something humorous, or clever, or even both. But oh no, that's too much effort for crazy old Tired Gelati Gecko. All he wants to do is go around telling people every little bit of our business. Well oh no. Enough is enough.

Not here you don't, no sir!

I am going to change the password to this blog, in the hope that you will not be able to get your demonic (yet admittedly very capable) hands on it.

And if that fails, I shall chain myself to my bed until I am rested enough that I can know you will not rear your troublesome mind.

I regret that I am driven to this course of action.

Yours in severity and responsibility,

Gelati Gecko Proper

15 September, 2010

It's Not Enough

It's not enough anymore,

To be an excellent student.

To be quick and clever,

Sure or smart or good with rhyming words.

Even if I still was,

It's not enough anymore.

...is what I might say, if this were a blog subject to frank emotional admissions. But I am worldly enough to realise that this sort of thing is 'self indulgent' and that I ought to be doing more practical things, such as polishing my resume for a job, or planning my career trajectory that will catapult me into the stars, or doing other important adult things that will probably take up the rest of my life, and rightly so, unless I want to be a timid nobody.

With school finished, all the rules have changed. It's not about good marks anymore - it's about where I'm going. It's about what I'm going to make of my life. And I only have one life.

I applied for a job today, and they said that we should list blogging if we have had experience blogging. I nearly listed this blog. But then I didn't want them reading this. Not particularly because they'll take one look and firmly cross my name out for being a crazy, but because I don't want it to be used for that. I don't want this blog to be used as a bargaining chip or piece of currency to get me jobs and money.

I'm not saying this is a virtuous, pure form of self expression that would be irretrievably compromised...but it is, in many senses, a record of me. A record of myself. And I want to keep this blog for my whole life.

I want to be able to open it, when I'm 90 (a generous assumption, but let's run with it), and look at posts I made when I was 16, and enjoy some of the most poignant scrumishing that ever there was.

Perhaps I shouldn't be publishing this post - It's 12am and I'm tired - my emotional guard (and of course the blessed competence facade) is down.

But I'll publish it anyway, and give future Gelati Gecko something to think about, hey?

Don't tell him! (Tired Gelati Gecko taps nose conspiratorially, winking as he thinks about the mayhem this may cause to his future self.)

12 September, 2010

So it goes Part 2.

I wasn't expecting that there would be a Part 2 to my earlier post.

But then Kathy Jones entered this thought provoking comment, which I think inspires a second post of its own:
Blogger NIPAPORN said...

I have suffered with bad breath for about 9 years now. I spent a small fortune on bad breath cures. Nothing I tried seem to work even as it said it would. I read this site and think it is useful and gives me something to think about. In any case it is always helpful to just to have people writing about it. I did find this site Oraltech Labs & their advice helped me most, I’ve got a boyfriend now & he said its working, hope it helps you too. Kindest, Kathy Jones. NJ.


It is interesting that this was Kathy's response to my post. I don't think she quite grasped the meaning of the excerpt from Slaughter-house Five. However, it is nice to know that she "read this site and think it is useful and gives me something to think about".

I tried to contact Kathy, so I could further discuss the ideas in the post she expressed such a keen interest in it - but alas, her profile is set to private, and so I am unable to follow up on what was a promising introduction.

Still, I felt I should at least acknowledge the diligence of Oraltech Labs (they will probably give me another comment now for having mentioned them, or who knows, they might even pay someone to read blog posts containing the term 'Oraltech Labs', because they are scared or at least wish to be aware of, the mighty influence my blog wields).

So I went and looked at their website, where they sell an e-book that apparently has all the answers on bad breath, and will make you happy and successful and you will never worry about anything like that ever again and people will like you and that will be enough. I could go and point and laugh at some minor mistakes on the website, but I am unsure if "confidents" is in fact a dental pun rather than an incorrect spelling of confidence.

So it goes (apologies to Vonnegut).

10 September, 2010

So it goes.

Today has been an unusual day thus far.

I’ve been reading Slapstick, a novel written by Kurt Vonnegut. He’s dead now.

Hi ho.

And I’m having one of those experiences where I’ve become so immersed in a book that I’m not even jolted into the outside world, but instead seeing it through the narrative lens of the book I’ve just been reading. Everything I see, I seem to imagine it through the dry, understated, deadpan humour of Vonnegut.

So it goes.

When I got off the train at Melbourne Central this morning, there was a woman at the top of the escalator. She was handing out pamphlets.

Pretty much everyone went past her, because they were probably in a hurry – they were right lane escalator people – no time to stand still. I took one of her brochures, and looked at it. It said on the front, which was yellow, with a big blue number ‘1’:

“What is the one thing you need to know before you become pregnant?

Take folic acid!

On the inside it explained that folic acid prevents birth defects such as spina bifida by up to 70 percent. Spina bifida is a neural tube defect and the most common one is when the spinal cord is poorly formed.

I turned around and nearly gave her back the pamphlet, because I’m not going to become pregnant anytime soon. Then I realised that she probably had spina bifida. She was in a wheelchair, you see.

So it goes.

Then I kept the pamphlet and read it cover to cover, because I figure that way at least her time wasn’t wasted. I already knew that folic acid was important, but now I feel like writing about it.

You can get folic acid through green leafy vegetables such as spinach and broccoli, lentils, chickpeas, oranges, and cereals.

The brochure was sponsored by Bayer HealthCare, who I guess want to sell folate supplements. The brochure says that “even if you eat food which has folic acid added to it, such as bread, you will almost certainly need more to obtain the required amount. Taking a supplement will help you to meet your daily needs.”

Hi ho.

And I’m sitting here at university, still in the bookish daze that follows immersion in a novel or written world.

I think I like Vonnegut’s writing because he doesn’t labour. He doesn’t force. He just writes what he sees. Sometimes that’s something bizarre, impossibly far fetched, and grotesque, but somehow it all feels true as well, because the world is crazy like that. People do die in freak accidents, or survive, or find themselves unable to love.

One of my favourite parts in Slaughter-House Five is the description of a book by fictional author Kilgore Trout:

“It was about a robot who had bad breath, who became popular after his halitosis was cured. But what made the story remarkable, since it was written in 1932, was that it predicted the widespread use of burning jellied gasoline on human beings.

It was dropped on them from airplanes. Robots did the dropping. They had no conscience, and no circuits which would allow them to imagine what was happening to the people on the ground.

Trout's leading robot looked like a human being, and could talk and dance and so on, and go out with girls. And nobody held it against him that he dropped jellied gasoline on people. But they found his halitosis unforgivable. But then he cleared that up, and he was welcomed to the human race.

He also presents a picture of the world that I don’t find completely depressing, even if his conclusions seem to be that humans will always kill each other, use intelligence for evil, and have wars, etc.

And so on.


P.S. There is something to be enjoyed about late night train trips.

Standing at Flinders Street, hoping I’ll see a rat scurrying about the dark, wet tracks,

When a cat at a station pads past in perfect time with my music.

04 September, 2010

The Competence Facade

The competence facade is a something which a part of my mind is always working at maintaining. I've come to understand that it relies largely on the amount of energy available. When energy levels are generally high, the competence facade is comfortably maintained. More or less, I'll find myself offering upbeat, positive, 'I got my stuff together' statements.


However, the more tired I become, the less expendable energy there is to regulate this, which I can only presume inevitably leads to this exchange between the small cerebral denizens who decide how power is allocated to different brain processes:

"We're running on reduced processing power, what should we do?"

"We need to cut power from somewhere...I guess we'll do the usual?"

"Yep, bring down the competence illusion."

After this, the response to that conversational staple question, "How are you?", can be a very different one:


And the asker is left trying to figure out the best way to extricate themselves from a terrifying monologue of raw emotional and psychological anxiety that should never have seen the light of day (or the light of polite conversation, at least).

On lowered energy, I no longer believe I am competent. I no longer care if I am seen as competent. I cease to trust myself to run my own life, and begin to doubt every decision I have made thus far.

I am overwhelmed with the desire to be a child again, tucked up warm and safe in bed, knowing that the big world out there is out of my control, and I don't need to worry about it.

So usually I do just that, until I have slept well enough that my mind can re-assemble the facade, and 'competent' mental governance of my life can resume.


31 August, 2010

I Write Like Me

A close friend introduced me to a curious website today. It is called "I Write Like", and claims to tell you which famous authors you are similar to in terms of writing style.

http://iwl.me/

'What a great idea!' I thought to myself. So immediately I set about seeing if my Dickens parody was like Dickens, my The Importance of Being Earnest spoof similar to Wilde, or my Year 12 Lit SAC on The French Lieutenant's Woman was like John Fowles.

And after receiving mixed responses, including quite an adamant consensus by the website that my blog style is most closely aligned with that of H. P. Lovecraft, pioneering gothic and horror writer, whose works had the unifying theme of 'cosmic horror', or the incomprehensibility of human existence and life (perhaps not entirely mismatched).

I am easily distracted by websites such as this one. And so it is that I am going to attempt to discover what it is that makes this site match writing with specific authors.

***STOP READING NOW IF YOU HAVE NO INTEREST IN A DETAILED, QUASI-SCIENTIFIC SERIES OF HYPOTHESES AND TESTING***

Hypothesis #1: The website merely links you to authors based on word association, not tone or style.

Test 1: Harry Potter

This test is very straightforward. I chose a gothic story I had written which received the label of 'Oscar Wilde'.

I then prefaced this with: "Hermione, Harry, Ron, Dumbledore, Snape, Godric Gryffindor, Rowena Ravenclaw, Salazar Slytherin, Helga Hufflepuff, Hagrid, Hogwarts, Lupin, Flitwick, Expelliarmus, Avada Kedavra."

These are all specific to Harry Potter. Not to the broader fantasy genre, but specifically Harry Potter.

And lo, suddenly I was writing like J.K. Rowling, according to the website.

Conclusion: Hypothesis #1 has been supported by this experiment.

I actually don't have any more hypotheses after that. It seems I've cracked the code. But now comes the best part - trying to get your writing named as certain authors, without using words which directly reference their writing...in only a few sentences.

For example:

J.K. Rowling

"You shouldn't have done that," said Gemima, frowning disapprovingly.
"It wasn't stealing! There was nobody there anyway," replied George defensively, feeling a twinge of guilt all the same.

Success!

Charles Dickens

Not 5 years ago, had you asked the inhabitants of Lyme whether Mr Bumblescoff was a hard working man, you would almost certainly have received a response firmly planted in the negative, but today, this was certainly not the case - indeed, it was well known (and, one suspects, enthusiastically circulated by Mr Bumblescoff himself!) that he was the very epitome of respectability, industry, and productivity.

Success!

etc.

27 August, 2010

This was posted on the 27th August!

I know that there are plenty of people in the world who (passively, through raising awareness and combatting ignorance) fight for honourable causes.

For equality of all individuals, for the right for all individuals to live in a world unspoilt by human avarice.

For the right to education.

These are noble fights.

This is not a noble fight.

This is a petty, small-minded fight which I have tried to stop myself from fighting.

But some part of my mind, quite possibly adjacent to the grammarckle, insists that I cannot rest until I have voiced the indignation bubbling inside me.

Like an insidious virus, an illogical, incomprehensible habit has been burrowing its way into the English language, and has now reached near universal usage.

I am, of course, talking about how it is now apparently the standard to put the month beforethe date. So that dates read like this:

June 14, 2010

Instead of:

14th June, 2010

Why?! Why, why, why?

I have tried to find some sort of justification behind it, but it is insensible to basic reason.

Possible reasons are:
- Now we can instantly see the month, without having to scan the two letters before it. This saves us precious time, because we live in an age when we are processing and storing more information and data than ever before.
- ....

There is no logical reasoning behind this change, and it is even worse when applied to dates written like this:

12/08/10

becomes..

08/12/10

By that I don't mean that the 12th of August becomes the 8th of December, although it does look like that. I'm going to be the conservative in this debate. Why would we change a logical system, moving from the smallest unit of time (days) to the largest (years)?

That's a real question. If you have any ideas, let me know...

24 August, 2010

The Grammarckle

The grammarckle is a creature which lives within my mind. It resides there quite peacefully, passing its time assisting me with my writing, doing its best to make sure that sentences are constructed logically and with correct syntax, etc.


Except that this is never quite enough for the grammarckle. The grammarckle is a highly opportunistic and ambitious creature, and will eagerly seize upon any opportunity which arises to dominate the mind of its host.

This most often occurs when the mind is unoccupied, bored, or angry. The grammarckle uses these moments to "subjugate the mind to its invariably grammar-related whims" (Masters and Smith, 2006).

This can manifest itself in a few different ways. One of these is in situations where brain activity is sluggish, where the boredom is such that the grammarckle is able to almost completely assert control of mental faculties, so that every small grammatical error or ambiguity it detects is leapt upon with vicious, spiteful, joy.

For example:

Harry was zoning in and out of the P.R. lecture, which was just a mish-mash of acronyms, tree diagrams, and target publics, which were being 'revised' for the umpteenth time. Suddenly he looked up at the slide and noticed that the lecturer had written 'bare' when in fact they meant 'bear'.

Somehow unable to contain himself, Harry nudged the people around him, and pointed out the spelling mistake. The grammarckle within him purred in silky contentment.

The grammarckle has taken control here, and will usually use its host as a means of informing other grammarkcles living inside nearby hosts of its discovery (Masters and Smith, 2006).

It would be very easy to conclude that the grammarckle only ever exerts a negative influence, but this would be to understate the important role a humble grammarckle plays in society - to maintain vigilance against lax expression and spelling.

Acknowledge your grammarckle, and appreciate it.

Yet you must know how to control it, because an unleashed grammarckle can cause havoc with its self-righteous, tactless ways. Most guides advise that grammarckle may be placated with "a bowl of roughly chopped quince and lamb's fry, or a new word to play with," (Williams, 2009).


References:
  • Masters, John, and Smith, Geraldine, Mind Over Matter: How the Grammarckle Is Controlling Us All, published by Cambridge University Press, 2006, Cambridge
  • Williams, Henry, Taming the Grammarckle Within, published by Random House, 2009, Canberra (pp. 30-56)

19 August, 2010

"I'm not a stalker," insists observant Facebook user

A man who understandably wishes to remain anonymous yesterday committed a major gaffe by letting slip to a co-worker his awareness of a Facebook photo she and a mutual friend had been commenting on extensively.

"He just dropped it into conversation," the co-worker said.

"It was so awkward. How could he have known that? It was a private exchange just between myself, my friend, and every single one of our mutual friends who could see it in their news feed," she elaborated.

"It's so inappropriate that he should know that!"

Other workers who witnessed the incident described it as "truly cringeworthy".

"You could see from the moment he said it, he realised it was one of those things he should simply be aware of, but never raise in social conversation," Samantha Preemslydale recalled.

This is not the first time that the privacy of Facebook has been an issue of public debate. The International Stalking Education and Evaluation Union (ISEEU) have previously condemned the "inexcusably lax" privacy settings of the popular social networking site.

"It's just putting people like us out of a job," ISEEU Treasurer Tom Peeper said.

"Once upon a time, there was an art to stalking. It was a kind of flirtatious, wild, foreplay, to unravel the secret web of facts that are hidden behind the person in the street.

"Since Facebook, everything is laid bare. It's no longer a challenge, and not nearly as rewarding."

Facebook have urged people to ignore the fact that everything they put on Facebook is Facebook's property, and to continue to upload their lives into the social networking site, which is used to attract targeted advertisements.

8.40pm update: The man has been identified as Gerald Driver, a 29 year old man who lives in Essex, UK.

His birthdate is 15th August 1981, and he is a fan of 'I'm the boy who lived LOL JKS I'm Cedric Diggory', 'I lock my animal in my room when I get lonely', and 'When I'm home alone and I hear a noise...I completely freeze'.

He states his political views as 'socially conservative, economically neo-liberal', is interested in women, looking for 'friendship', and his favourite quotations include Winston Churchill's "I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly."

He has 214 friends and his last status update was "Gerald Driver has had enough of embarasing himself lol!"

15 August, 2010

Commuter Exchanges Awkward Banter With Ticket Inspector

A train commuter today made a concerted effort to display a friendly, polite, and compassionate attitude towards an Authorised Public Transport Officer.

"I wanted to show that I realise it's not their fault, and that they are just doing their job," explained regular commuter Steven Jeffreys. "Unfortunately they interpreted my polite veneer of civility as a genuine interest in socially interacting with them after they had checked my ticket."

Jeffreys felt 'caught' and 'trapped', as the team of three inspectors proceeded to ask him mundane questions about his ticket.

"They asked me, 'Is the myki system working ok?' I replied 'yes, it is,' " he said of the incident, which he concedes probably only lasted 'a minute or two' but felt like 'an eternity of awkwardness'.

Jeffreys admitted also that he frequently suffers from extreme annoyance, anger, and frustration when asked to interact with other human beings in any way whatsoever. "As soon as I get on the train, it's iPod on, fuck off everyone," he said lightly.

The Metro staff claimed to have been unaware of Jeffreys' discomfort, and were concerned when approached for a comment today.

"That's news to me," said Team Leader Catherine Martins, adjusting her Metro badge, which is approximately the same size and weight as a newborn child.